1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1998 Honda CR-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 230 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 70 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 128 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |