1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 191 kg more than 2000 Acura EL.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2000 Acura EL | |
Make | Austin | Acura |
Model | A 70 | EL |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2619 mm |