1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 625 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 70. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 70 | SSU |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 71 L |