1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2000 TVR Tamora
To start off, 2000 TVR Tamora is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,598 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 TVR Tamora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Tamora (334 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Tamora should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 TVR Tamora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 TVR Tamora has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1952 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 TVR Tamora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 2000 TVR Tamora | |
| Make | Austin | TVR |
| Model | A 70 | Tamora |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 334 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1230 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |
