1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2003 Pontiac Bonneville

To start off, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville (200 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 350 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 70. (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 70.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 70 2003 Pontiac Bonneville
Make Austin Pontiac
Model A 70 Bonneville
Year Released 1952 2003
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 66 HP 200 HP
Torque 157 Nm 311 Nm
Torque RPM 1700 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.5 mm 96.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.8:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]