1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 70 (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Austin | Subaru |
Model | A 70 | R2 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 30 L |