1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 917 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 70. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2004 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 70 | Silverado |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 488 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2197 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 129 L |