1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 15 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 70 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |
