1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 70 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 87 L |