1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2008 Fiat Palio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2008 Fiat Palio.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2008 Fiat Palio | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 70 | Palio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 54 L |