1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1952 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 172 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |