1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 330 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 70 2008 Nissan X-Trail
Make Austin Nissan
Model A 70 X-Trail
Year Released 1952 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 63 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 94 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L