1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 70 2008 Volkswagen Polo
Make Austin Volkswagen
Model A 70 Polo
Year Released 1952 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 1895 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 63 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 95.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 45 L