1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 4 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 70 | HHR |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |