1952 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 70 | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 104 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |