1952 Austin A 90 vs. 1959 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1959 Ford 12 M is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 90 (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 90 | 1959 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 90 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
