1952 Austin A 90 vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 1964 Holden EK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 90 (87 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 90 (190 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1952 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 90 | 1964 Holden EK | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 90 | EK |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 65 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |