1952 Austin A 90 vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 90 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1952 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 90 | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 90 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |