1952 Austin A 90 vs. 2000 BMW Z9

To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 296 kg more than 1952 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 90. (190 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 90 2000 BMW Z9
Make Austin BMW
Model A 90 Z9
Year Released 1952 2000
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2660 cc 4398 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 87 HP 282 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 440 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1686 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2960 mm