1952 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 90. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 90 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence.
Because 1952 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 90 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 90 | Fluence |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2702 mm |