1952 Austin A vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1956 Toyota Master RR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A (124 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 765 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A | Master RR |
Year Released | 1952 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2540 mm |