1952 Austin A vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1958 Jeep CJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jeep CJ (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 795 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A | CJ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2060 mm |
