1952 Austin A vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 865 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | A | Munga |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 74 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 31 L |