1952 Austin A vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 1970 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A | Colt |
Year Released | 1952 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |