1952 Austin A vs. 1974 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Calais is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Calais (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 285 kg more than 1952 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A | 1974 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A | Calais |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 2260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3310 mm |
