1952 Austin A vs. 1989 Daihatsu Leeza
To start off, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A | 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | |
| Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
| Model | A | Leeza |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 548 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 62 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 60.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 28 L |
