1952 Austin A vs. 1996 Buick Century
To start off, 1996 Buick Century is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A (124 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1996 Buick Century. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Century.
Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A (288 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Buick Century. (180 Nm). This means 1952 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 1996 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A | Century |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2664 mm |