1952 Austin A vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 1265 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A | Minica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2350 mm |
