1952 Austin A vs. 2005 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (502 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 2005 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A | Caprice |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 502 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |