1952 Austin A vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A | Tribute |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2262 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 288 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 62 L |