1952 Austin A vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z

To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 435 kg more than 2006 Nissan 350Z.

Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 2006 Nissan 350Z
Make Austin Nissan
Model A 350Z
Year Released 1952 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 3491 cc
Horse Power 124 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 288 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1975 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 76 L