1952 Austin A vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac SRX. (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A | SRX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 288 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |