1952 Austin A vs. 2009 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (242 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 540 kg more than 2009 Subaru Outback.

Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (297 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 2009 Subaru Outback
Make Austin Subaru
Model A Outback
Year Released 1952 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 124 HP 242 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 288 Nm 297 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1975 kg 1435 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 64 L