1952 Austin A vs. 2011 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2011 Opel Meriva is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2011 Opel Meriva. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Meriva. (130 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A | 2011 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Austin | Opel |
| Model | A | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
