1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Toyota SA weights approximately 225 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | 100 | SA |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2410 mm |
