1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1960 Nissan Cedric is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2540 mm |