1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1961 Volvo 220 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Volvo 220 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 144 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
| Model | 100 | 220 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |
