1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1974 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Calais is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Calais (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1974 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3310 mm |
