1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | 100 | 323 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2370 mm |