1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Zastava |
Model | 100 | 102 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2160 mm |