1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (145 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (251 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. (144 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Starion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | 100 | Starion |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |