1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 1983 Renault 9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 100 | 9 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |