1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Citation II is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II weights approximately 643 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Citation II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin-Healey 100 has manual transmission. 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1984 Chevrolet Citation II | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | 100 | Citation II |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1588 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2580 mm |