1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Minica. (29 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Minica.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Minica. (41 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1984 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 100 | Minica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 546 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2270 mm |
