1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1987 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1987 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin-Healey 100 has manual transmission. 1952 Austin-Healey 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1987 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |