1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1995 Bentley Turbo
To start off, 1995 Bentley Turbo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 1995 Bentley Turbo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Bentley |
| Model | 100 | Turbo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3070 mm |
