1952 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey 100. (144 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey 100 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Kia |
Model | 100 | K2700 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2390 mm |