1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1943 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1943 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | Tickford | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 5675 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1860 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3280 mm |
