1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1953 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 1953 Nissan Sedan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1953 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1953 Nissan Sedan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1953 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
| Model | Tickford | Sedan |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1953 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 860 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
