1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1955 Morris Cowley
To start off, 1955 Morris Cowley is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1955 Morris Cowley. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1955 Morris Cowley. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 474 kg more than 1955 Morris Cowley. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1955 Morris Cowley | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Morris |
| Model | Tickford | Cowley |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |
